Big bunch of issues
I've actually got several issues, so here goes.
First of all, I totally do not get why code completion for a particular workflow provides only elements for one of my projects whereas there are several projects in play. Nowhere in Workflow IDE did I explicitly specify that a workflow 'corresponds' to a single project, and in fact I need my project to access several projects at the same time. This is what type annotations are for, but it seems I get pervasive completion only when I attach to several projects, which is *completely unnecessary*.
While working on the above, I had to perform an initial
to make sure I'm in the right project. I couldn't find an intention to do an if wrap, nor could I just write
. This is a very big deficiency in the implementation of workflows as I effectively have to rewrite the whole thing again just to have all my code wrapped by a very big
Why, despite the apparent support for
, is it still virtually impossible to use? It's a simple type, so I should be able to do
var foo = 0.1
in a workflow or set the value to
in the command window. These are currently either impossible or possible but with erroneous syntax highlighting in the Workflow editor.
There should be a way of clearly identifying numeric literals and truncating them to particular precision. Best idea: just expose
with all its APIs. At the moment,
numbers dump their internal representation to the output, whereas in most cases I want to truncate to 2 decimal places.
I desperately need subroutines or functions or lambdas or whatever. In fact, this kind of leads me to the conclusion that perhaps exposing a proper Java or similar API would make more sense, especially if you want people to leverage workflows for very complicated business processes.
Assignee.oldValue returning nothing in custom workflow
Can not createCopy() on state done ?
Build #178 (Dec/17/2014 3:47PM)